I've popped to the party offices in Clapham, and run across our archivist here. So, I put him to work, and here are our votes from the 1973
GLC election:
Islington North | Buick | 284 |
Hackney North & Stoke Newington | Carter | 250 |
Hampstead | Cox | 191 |
Hornsey | Porter | 144 |
Streatham | Simpkins | 120 |
Vauxhall | Sansum | 121 |
Lambeth Central | Baldwin | 115 |
Tottenham | A. Young | 109 |
Holborn & St. Pancras | Davies | 99 |
Norwood | H. Young | 95 |
St. Marylebone | Weidberg | 84 |
If we take those seats in our 2012 area, Norwood, Streatham, Lambeth Central and Vauxhall, we have 451. The Old GLC constituencies were much smaller and more numerous, but judging by their names they seem to have corresponded with the rough size of a Parliamentary constituency, and seem to have had electoral lists totalling about 45,000 voters. So that was 451 out of about 185,000 potential voters.As the wikipedia article, linked to above, states, 1973 was a changed electoral system. Here are our totals for 1970
Camden | Cox | 391 |
Camden | Davies | 323 |
Camden | Grant | 299 |
Ealing | George | 735 |
Ealing | Buchanan | 695 |
Ealing | Rose | 392 |
Ealing | Sawyer | 293 |
Haringey | Carter | 443 |
Haringey | Buick | 374 |
Haringey | Waite | 212 |
Lambeth | Garnham | 620 |
Lambeth | Phillips | 536 |
Lambeth | Simkins | 295 |
As can be seen, these were multi-member constituencies, so we could be picking up stray votes from other parties. We can take our "real" vote as being our top vote in each, which to summarise were:
Camden | Cox | 391 |
Ealing | George | 735 |
Haringey | Carter | 443 |
Lambeth | Garnham | 620 |
We're mostly conerned with Lambeth. Now, note, this is across the whole borough (hence the much higher votes than 1973). Lambeth is, obviously, what is now our main stomping ground of Lambeth and Southwark. 620 votes in 1970 can be roughly coubled (assuming an equivilent vote available in Southwark) to give us 1,200 - about our result in 2008, but about half of our vote this time. The above results were about 0.6% of the vote. But, let's look at 1967.
Camden | Buchanan | 907 |
Camden | Grant | 419 |
Camden | Giles | 411 |
Ealing | Cox | 1250 |
Ealing | George | 1107 |
Ealing | Rose | 611 |
Ealing | Wait | 441 |
Haringey | Buick | 1277 |
Haringey | Carter | 1191 |
Haringey | Davies | 1067 |
Lambeth | Garnham | 1362 |
Lambeth | Baldwin | 970 |
Lambeth | Phillips | 806 |
And those headlines again:
Lambeth | Garnham | 1362 |
Haringey | Buick | 1277 |
Ealing | Cox | 1250 |
Camden | Buchanan | 907 |
Now, intriguingly, we were up against Communist Party opposition that year, and by and large they ouit polled us. Except in Lambeth, where Garnham came above one of the communist candidates. 1967 was not a year of crisis (in fact, it was the year before the crisis, while the going was still relatively good). It was a year of voting against the incumbant Labour government (so the Tories got in) and that may explain our quite high vote in Haringey (1.8%), and our then record in Lambeth (1.3%). To continue my unscientific procedure, if we double the Lambeth vote, we get 2724, just behind our score this time. Last time led to Tory government and to a surge back to Labour, this time we achieved our vote during a surge to Labour, which suggests there may be space for more growth. but in any case, it looks like 2012 is definitively our best election result ever. The trick now will be to build on that vote.
1 comment:
Post a Comment